CNN reports that the only states that are still uncommitted (according to the polls) are six states that were for Bush in 2004. They are now a toss up but if they all go to McCain he will still lose. Nonetheless they are essential to a successful campaign and so McCain and Palin are forced to devote increasing precious time campaigning in these states, states which are historically linked to Republican candidates.
Again, as was the case with Hillary Clinton, Obama’s campaign seems better organized in the late stages of the campaign. Clinton ran out of money and McCain is running out of time. Assuming that he had several states in his pocket, McCain finds himself having to make last minute appearances in states where there has been heavy traffic by the other ticket.
McCain finds himself scrambling for the support of states which are necessary but not sufficient for success in November. Meanwhile Obama is pressing the fight in these states, apparently fighting for a landslide victory.
CNN’s David Gergen says that the Obama’s purpose is to have a decisive victory so that he can claim a mandate which in turn will presumably enhance his ability to govern.
We haven’t heard about mandates in a while. I don’t recall Bill Clinton talking about it but he certainly never acted like he had one. George W. Bush acted like he had a mandate (more than any president I can think of) but he certainly never had one. Each election boiled down to disputed election results in one state.
Reagan claimed a mandate to get stuff through a largely Democratic Congress. How would a mandate serve Obama? Particularly with what is expected to be a larger majority of Democrats in Congress.
In Washington State we have a super-majority of Democrats in the legislature and have experienced a withering of the party’s agenda. Few voting Democrats express anything but disappointment with the Democrat-controlled Congress after 2006.
It would be very exciting if Obama were looking to claim a mandate of leadership within his party. The party desperately needs direction. It has been a long time since the party stood for something that you could identify and point to legislation for examples. That may be a little broad, but I’ll bet it is true of at least 80% of people who are registered Democrats.
For twenty years or so the Republicans and the Democrats have been “pigs at the same trough” to quote William Greider. Obama has proved himself as a campaigner; wouldn’t it be great to find that he is as good a leader?