A common document for which I have not see a standard form is the water easement. The laws of the various states different in the treatment of these easements but nonetheless there are some common technical issues that the drafter should consider. The term “water easement” commonly means one of two things. First, it might transfer the right to draw water from a site. The phrase is also used to describe the right to convey water by pipe or trough across or beneath the land of another. A water easement of either sort should also contain an access easement and auxiliary rights related to the maintenance, repair, replacement and possibly construction of improvements.
The easement may either be given to the owner of land so that the easement rights pass automatically with the transfer of title to the land or given to a person or entity. The first type of easement is called an appurtenant easement, even though in Washington the two parcels are not necessarily required to have a common boundary. The second mentioned type of easement is somewhat awkwardly called an easement in gross. (American law is derived from English law but easements in gross are not recognized in England. This concept is derived from Roman law.) It should be clear which of these alternatives is intended and if the easement is intended to benefit a person or entity, then the drafter has to be concerned that the easement is valid under state law.
If the intention is merely to give a person permission to draw water or convey it across land, then consideration should be given to calling the right a license, rather than an easement. Licenses are less formal and less likely to impact title. They are also usually revocable. An irrevocable license requires consideration and is best treated with the formality of a commercial easement in gross.
In any case the instrument should always contain all intended conditions on the use. For example, there might a set duration, a limit on amount of water, limitations on access, size of pipe, licensing, type of use, who may use the easement, a condition related to the land owner’s use of the property. From the land owner’s perspective rather than having a long list of conditions, it might be best to use a nonassignable, revocable license.
Easements should contain the legal description of the land that is subject to the easement and should in most cases be recorded. Easements appurtenant should also describe the benefitted land. It is prudent to specify the amount of water that is authorized to be taken from the source, permitted use and sometimes the depth of a well. Remember that in Washington the land owner will be required to sign a covenant that prohibits use within one hundred feet of a well used for drinking water.
If the easement is given for future development it is best to make it immediately effective, not effective whenever the development occurs to avoid creating a voidable future interest.